CTGT
PLM Implementation Intelligence

Every PLM implementationneeds automations.None of them need to be custom code.

From our experience implementing and migrating enterprise PLM systems, we have catalogued 50+ business process automations that virtually every manufacturing company requires. With PLM Neo, every one of these is a configuration, not a coding project.

Custom code per engagement

380+

person-days of development

vs

With PLM Neo

Weeks

through plain language configuration

Applicable:New PLM implementations · Platform upgrades · Agile PLM to Teamcenter migrations · Any Teamcenter engagement

How it works

The automation burden every PLM implementation carries.

PLM platforms deliver powerful out-of-the-box capabilities — but every manufacturing company has business-specific processes that go beyond them. Without PLM Neo, each one is a custom development project. With PLM Neo, each one is a plain language configuration.

Without PLM Neo
1

Business requirement identified

e.g. EBOM must auto-sync to MBOM on ECO release — not in OOTB Teamcenter

2

Custom code written

PLM developer codes the automation in ITK or Java — specific to the platform version

3

Test, deploy, document

QA cycles, deployment, and maintenance documentation for every automation

4

Repeat — and again on every upgrade

50+ automations. Each platform upgrade risks breaking the custom code layer

380+ person-days · Permanent technical debt · Upgrade risk forever
PLMNeo
With PLM Neo
1

Same automation inventory

All 50+ automations — described in plain language

2

Configure, not code

Business logic set up as PLM Neo tasks — no custom code written

3

Upgrade-proof by design

Business layer sits above Teamcenter — platform upgrades don't touch it

Fraction of the cost · Upgrade-proof · Team can evolve it

The automation landscape

Six categories. Every PLM customer needs them. All addressable through PLM Neo.

Automation scope — Agile PLM → Teamcenter migration

Traditional: Custom Code

// EBOM → MBOM Sync
@EventHandler(type=WORKFLOW_STATUS_CHANGE)
public void ebomToMbomSync(TCEvent e){
  // 340 lines of custom ITK code...
}
// Revision Scheme Logic
@EventHandler(type=CREATE_OBJECT)
public void setNewRevision(TCEvent e){
  // Proto→Production state logic...
}
// Cost Sheet Generator
@EventHandler(type=WF_TRANSITION)
public void generateCostSheet(TCEvent e){
  // Excel template fill logic...
}
50+ files · 380+ person-days · Re-written on every upgrade

PLM Neo: Plain Language Configuration

EBOM → MBOM Synchronisation

When a production ECO reaches Released status, automatically create manufacturing parts and sync the manufacturing BOM.

Configured

Maturity-Driven Revision Scheme

Use numeric revision in prototype stage; switch to alphabetical when maturity changes to production.

Configured

Cost Sheet Generation

At Sales Review workflow stage, generate PE, Purchasing and Summary cost sheets from the template using current BOM data.

Configured

Plain language · Weeks to implement · Survives every upgrade

Impact

What this means for your PLM programme.

💡

Proven in a real engagement

Catalogued from an Agile PLM to Teamcenter migration for a Tier-1 automotive supplier in Canada. 50+ automations. Not hypothetical.

🔒

Upgrade-proof by design

Business logic lives in the PLM Neo layer, above the platform. Future Teamcenter upgrades don't break your processes.

👥

No developer required

Your team describes new automations in plain language. No PLM developer or specialist consultant required every time something needs to change.

📊

Six categories, fully covered

BOM synchronisation · Revision management · Document generation · Data validation · Workflow intelligence · Supplier management.

Recognise these automation requirements in your PLM programme?

Walk us through your process requirements. We'll show you how PLM Neo addresses them — without writing a line of custom code.